Specificity of latent TGF-β binding protein (LTBP) incorporation into matrix: Role of fibrillins and fibronectin

Fibrillin microfibrils are extracellular matrix structures with essential functions in the development and the organization of tissues including blood vessels, bone, limbs and the eye. Fibrillin‐1 and fibrillin‐2 form the core of fibrillin microfibrils, to which multiple proteins associate to form a highly organized structure. Defining the components of this structure and their interactions is crucial to understand the pathobiology of microfibrillopathies associated with mutations in fibrillins and in microfibril‐associated molecules. In this study, we have analyzed both in vitro and in vivo the role of fibrillin microfibrils in the matrix deposition of latent TGF‐β binding protein 1 (LTBP‐1), ‐3 and ‐4; the three LTBPs that form a complex with TGF‐β. In Fbn1^?/? ascending aortas and lungs, LTBP‐3 and LTBP‐4 are not incorporated into a matrix lacking fibrillin‐1 microfibrils, whereas LTBP‐1 is still deposited. In addition, in cultures of Fbn1^?/? smooth muscle cells or lung fibroblasts, LTBP‐3 and LTBP‐4 are not incorporated into a matrix lacking fibrillin‐1 microfibrils, whereas LTBP‐1 is still deposited. Fibrillin‐2 is not involved in the deposition of LTBP‐1 in Fbn1^?/? extracellular matrix as cells deficient for both fibrillin‐1 and fibrillin‐2 still incorporate LTBP‐1 in their matrix. However, blocking the formation of the fibronectin network in Fbn1^?/? cells abrogates the deposition of LTBP‐1. Together, these data indicate that LTBP‐3 and LTBP‐4 association with the matrix depends on fibrillin‐1 microfibrils, whereas LTBP‐1 association depends on a fibronectin network. J. Cell. Physiol. 227: 3828–3836, 2012. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Dual functions for LTBP in lung development: LTBP‐4 independently modulates elastogenesis and TGF‐β activity

The latent TGF‐β binding proteins (LTBP) ‐1, ‐3, and ‐4 are extracellular proteins that assist in the secretion and localization of latent TGF‐β. The null mutation of LTBP‐4S in mice causes defects in the differentiation of terminal air‐sacs, fragmented elastin, and colon carcinomas. We investigated lung development from embryonic day 14.5 (E14.5) to day 7 after birth (P7) in order to determine when the defects in elastin organization initiate and to further examine the relation of TGF‐β signaling levels and air‐sac septation in Ltbp4S?/? lungs. We found that defects in elastogenesis are visible as early as E14.5 and are maintained in the alveolar walls, in blood vessel media, and subjacent airway epithelium. The air‐sac septation defect was associated with excessive TGF‐β signaling and was reversed by lowering TGF‐β2 levels. Thus, the phenotype is not directly reflective of a change in TGF‐β1, the only TGF‐β isoform known to complex with LTBP‐4. Reversal of the air‐sac septation defect was not associated with normalization of the elastogenesis indicating two separate functions of LTBP‐4 as a regulator of elastic fiber assembly and TGF‐β levels in lungs. J. Cell. Physiol. 219: 14–22, 2009. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Latent Transforming Growth Factor ��-binding Proteins and Fibulins Compete for Fibrillin-1 and Exhibit Exquisite Specificities in Binding Sites

Latent transforming growth factor (TGF) β-binding proteins (LTBPs) interact with fibrillin-1. This interaction is important for proper sequestration and extracellular control of TGFβ. Surface plasmon resonance interaction studies show that residues within the first hybrid domain (Hyb1) of fibrillin-1 contribute to interactions with LTBP-1 and LTBP-4. Modulation of binding affinities by fibrillin-1 polypeptides in which residues in the third epidermal growth factor-like domain (EGF3) are mutated demonstrates that the binding sites for LTBP-1 and LTBP-4 are different and suggests that EGF3 may also contribute residues to the binding site for LTBP-4. In addition, fibulin-2, fibulin-4, and fibulin-5 bind to residues contained within EGF3/Hyb1, but mutated polypeptides again indicate differences in their binding sites in fibrillin-1. Results demonstrate that these protein-protein interactions exhibit “exquisite specificities,” a phrase commonly used to describe monoclonal antibody interactions. Despite these differences, interactions between LTBP-1 and fibrillin-1 compete for interactions between fibrillin-1 and these fibulins. All of these proteins have been immunolocalized to microfibrils. However, in fibrillin-1 (Fbn1) null fibroblast cultures, LTBP-1 and LTBP-4 are not incorporated into microfibrils. In contrast, in fibulin-2 (Fbln2) null or fibulin-4 (Fbln4) null cultures, fibrillin-1, LTBP-1, and LTBP-4 are incorporated into microfibrils. These data show for the first time that fibrillin-1, but not fibulin-2 or fibulin-4, is required for appropriate matrix assembly of LTBPs. These studies also suggest that the fibulins may affect matrix sequestration of LTBPs, because in vitro interactions between these proteins are competitive.Fibrillin microfibrils are ubiquitous structural elements in the connective tissue. Fibrillin microfibrils provide organs with tissue-specific architectural frameworks designed to support the mature functional integrity of the particular organ. In addition, fibrillin microfibrils contribute to proper developmental patterning of organs by targeting growth factors to the right location in the extracellular matrix (1, 2).Molecules of fibrillin-1 (3), fibrillin-2 (4, 5), and fibrillin-3 (6) polymerize to form the backbone structure of microfibrils. Latent TGFβ-binding protein (LTBP)³-1 associates with fibrillin microfibrils in the perichondrium and in osteoblast cultures (7, 8), and LTBP-1 and LTBP-4 interact with fibrillin (9). Other proteins associated with fibrillin microfibrils include the fibulins (10, 11), microfibril-associated glycoprotein-1 and -2 (12, 13), decorin (14), biglycan (15), versican (16), and perlecan (17). It is likely that one function of these associated extracellular matrix molecules is to connect the fibrillin microfibril scaffold to other architectural elements in tissue- and organ-specific patterns.In addition to performing architectural functions, fibrillins bind directly to prodomains of bone morphogenetic proteins and growth and differentiation factors (18, 19) and LTBPs bring with them the small latent TGFβ complex (20), suggesting that the microfibril scaffold may position, concentrate, and control growth factor signaling. Studies of fibrillin-1 (Fbn1) and fibrillin-2 (Fbn2) mutant mice demonstrate that loss of fibrillins results in phenotypes associated with dysregulated TGFβ (21–23) or bone morphogenetic protein (24) signaling. Microfibril-associated glycoprotein-1 (Magp-1) null mice reveal phenotypes that may also be related to abnormal TGFβ signaling (25).In a previous study (9), we determined that the binding site for LTBP-1 and -4 is contained within a specific four-domain region of fibrillin-1. In this study, we performed additional experiments to more precisely define the LTBP binding site. At the same time, we compared binding of fibulins to fibrillin, because the region in fibrillin-1 that was suggested to contain the fibulin binding site (11) was very close to our region of interest for LTBP binding. Our results demonstrate that LTBPs and fibulins compete for binding to fibrillin-1. However, the proteins tested (LTBP-1, LTBP-4, fibulin-2, fibulin-4, and fibulin-5) displayed “exquisite specificities” in their interactions with fibrillin-1.To test the potential significance of these interactions with fibrillin-1, we investigated matrix incorporation of LTBPs in cell cultures obtained from wild type, Fbn1 null, Fbn2 null, fibulin-2 (Fbln-2) null, and fibulin-4 (Fbln-4) null mice. In addition, we examined the distribution of LTBPs in Fbn1 null and Fbn2 null mice.     

Microfibril Structure Masks Fibrillin-2 in Postnatal Tissues

Fibrillin microfibrils are polymeric structures present in connective tissues. The importance of fibrillin microfibrils to connective tissue function has been demonstrated by the multiple genetic disorders caused by mutations in fibrillins and in microfibril-associated molecules. However, knowledge of microfibril structure is limited, largely due to their insolubility. Most previous studies have focused on how fibrillin-1 is organized within microfibril polymers. In this study, an immunochemical approach was used to circumvent the insolubility of microfibrils to determine the role of fibrillin-2 in postnatal microfibril structure. Results obtained from studies of wild type and fibrillin-1 null tissues, using monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies with defined epitopes, demonstrated that N-terminal fibrillin-2 epitopes are masked in postnatal microfibrils and can be revealed by enzymatic digestion or by genetic ablation of Fbn1. From these studies, we conclude that fetal fibrillin polymers form an inner core within postnatal microfibrils and that microfibril structure evolves as growth and development proceed into the postnatal period. Furthermore, documentation of a novel cryptic site present in EGF4 in fibrillin-1 underscores the molecular complexity and tissue-specific differences in microfibril structure.     

Solution structure of the third TB domain from LTBP1 provides insight into assembly of the large latent complex that sequesters latent TGF-beta

Almost all TGF-beta is secreted as part of a large latent complex. This complex is formed from three molecules, a latent transforming growth factor-beta binding protein (LTBP), which plays roles in targeting and activation, a latency associated peptide (LAP), which regulates latency, and the TGF-beta cytokine. LAP is the TGF-beta pro-peptide that is cleaved intracellularly prior to secretion, and TGF-beta binds non-covalently to LAP. Formation of the large latent complex is important for the efficient secretion of TGF-beta. Previous studies have revealed that the LTBP-LAP interaction is mediated by intracellular exchange of a single disulphide bond within the third, and only the third, TB domain (TB3) with LAP. We have previously reported the structure of a homologous TB domain from fibrillin-1. However, TB3 contains a two amino acid insertion, not found in fibrillin-1 TB domains, which is not amenable to molecular modelling. In order to clarify the basis of TB domain function, we have determined the solution NMR structure of TB3(LTBP1). Comparison with the fibrillin-1 TB domain reveals that the two-residue insertion is associated with a significant increase in solvent accessibility of one of the disulphide bonds (linking the second and sixth cysteine residues). Site-directed mutagenesis and NMR studies indicate that this is the only disulphide bond that can be removed without perturbing the TB domain fold. Furthermore, a ring of negatively charged residues has been identified that surrounds this disulphide bond. Homology modelling suggests that the surface properties of TB3 domains from different LTBP isoforms correlate with binding activities. This research provides testable hypotheses regarding the molecular basis of complex formation between LTBPs and LAPs.     

Growth retardation as well as spleen and thymus involution in latent TGF-beta binding protein (Ltbp)-3 null mice

The latent TGF-beta binding protein (LTBP)-3 is an extracellular matrix (ECM) protein that binds the small latent complex (SLC) of TGF-beta. Disruption of the Ltbp-3 gene by homologous recombination in mice yields mutant animals that display multiple skeletal abnormalities. In addition, these mice have retarded growth. On an inbred 129 SvEv background, half of the Ltbp-3 mutant mice die between 3 and 4 weeks after birth. These mice show severe involution of the thymus and spleen and a sharp reduction in the numbers of CD4/CD8 double positive T-cells in the thymus. The thymus and spleen defect is caused by elevated corticosterone levels in the serum and can be reversed by injection of aminoglutethimide (AMG), an inhibitor of steroid synthesis. This result indicates that the thymus and spleen defect is a secondary defect due to high corticosterone levels probably induced by stress of unknown etiology.     

A common polygenic basis for quinine and PROP avoidance in mice

Inbred strains of mice (Mus musculus) differ greatly in ability to taste various bitter compounds. For some compounds, the differences result from allelic variation at a single locus. However, segregation patterns incompatible with monogenic inheritance have been found for quinine avoidance. The Soa bitter sensitivity locus exerts some influence on this phenotype, but an unknown number of other loci also contribute. Relative avoidance patterns for quinine sulfate in panels of naive inbred strains resembled avoidance patterns for 6-n-propyl-2- thiouracil (PROP), suggesting a common genetic basis. In particular, C57BL/6J mice strongly avoided both 0.1 mM quinine sulfate and 1 mM PROP in two-bottle preference tests, whereas C3H/HeJ mice were indifferent to both. Therefore, 12 BXH/Ty recombinant inbred strains, derived from these strains, were tested with both solutions to begin identification of the unknown bitter loci. Naive mice were tested for four consecutive days with each compound (order counterbalanced). Some BXH/Ty strain means resembled those of the parent strains, but others were intermediate. This indicated recombination among loci affecting avoidance, and therefore polygenic inheritance. The strain means were highly correlated across compounds (r = 0.98), suggesting that the same polygenes controlled both phenotypes. The BXH/Ty means for both compounds were then compared with the strain genotypes at 212 chromosome position markers distributed throughout the genome. Eight markers on five chromosomes (3, 6, 7, 8 and 9) yielded significant correlations. Six of the markers were correlated with both phenotypes, again suggesting common polygenic inheritance. The marker with the highest correlation was Prp, tightly linked to Soa on chromosome 6. The correlated marker regions likely contain quantitative trait loci affecting bitter avoidance. The phenotypic similarity of PROP to quinine, rather than to phenylthiourea, apparently stemming from a common polygenic basis, indicates a difference between mice and humans in gustatory organization related to bitters.      

Role of extracellular matrix in the action of basic fibroblast growth factor: Matrix as a source of growth factor for long-term stimulation of plasminogen activator production and DNA synthesis

When bovine capillary endothelial (BCE) cells were treated with 10 ng/ml of basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) for 10 or 30 minutes at 37°C, washed extensively with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and incubated in bFGF-free medium, plasminogen activator (PA) production was stimulated to the same extent as in cells exposed continuously to bFGF. Three methods of removing bFGF from heparin-like binding sites in the extracellular matrix, but not from bFGF receptors, abolished this long-term effect of a brief exposure to bFGF. First, BCE cells exposed to bFGF for 30 minutes were washed with 2M NaCI and incubated in bFGF-free medium. Second, BCE cells were incubated with bFGF for 10 minutes in the presence of heparin, and cells were washed with PBS and incubated in bFGF-free medium. Third, BCE cell cultures were treated with heparinase and exposed to bFGF. Each of these treatments abolished the long-term (24-48 hours) stimulation of PA production normally observed after brief exposure to bFGF. In each of these experiments, incubation of cells in bFGF-containing medium after the treatments resulted in normal stimulation of PA production, demonstrating that the treatments did not harm the cells. Stimulation of DNA synthesis was observed when cells were exposed to bFGF for 2 hours at 4°C, incubated in bFGF-free medium for 24 hours at 37°C, and assayed for ³H-thymidine incorporation. However, no stimulation was observed if the 2 hours incubation at 4°C was carried out in the presence of heparin. Thus, long-term stimulation of PA activity and DNA synthesis after a brief exposure to bFGF seems to be a consequence of bFGF binding to the extracellular matrix. The extracellular matrixmay act as a physiologic buffer, binding bFGF when concentrations are high and releasing it later for interaction with its receptor. This interaction with matrix may be required for the in vivo action of bFGF.     

Cell density dependent effects of TGF-beta demonstrated by a plasminogen activator-based assay for TGF-beta.

Transforming growth factor-beta 1 (TGF-beta 1) induces a decrease in plasminogen activator (PA) expression in confluent cultures of bovine aortic endothelial (BAE) cells. We describe an assay using the suppression of PA expression in confluent BAE cells by TGF-beta 1 which detects concentrations of the growth factor ranging from 5 to 200 pg/ml and has an ED50 of 15-20 pg/ml. The assay can be performed in 96-well plates and requires a minimum of 35 ul of solution per sample, thereby limiting the amount of reagents required and allowing many samples to be tested in a single assay. Here we demonstrate that the effect of TGF-beta 1 on PA expression in BAE cells depends on the length of time the cells are exposed to the growth factor and the density at which the cells are plated. In cells plated at a high density (3.5 x 10(5) cells/cm2), both 4 h and 24 h exposures to TGF-beta 1 suppress PA expression. However, with cells plated sparsely (3.5 x 10(4) cells/cm2), a 4 h exposure to TGF-beta 1 increases PA expression 2-fold, whereas a 24 h exposure results in an 85% inhibition of basal PA expression. The paradoxical stimulation of PA expression in cells at a sparse density upon 4 h exposure to TGF-beta 1 occurs in a dose-dependent manner with an ED50 of 15-20 pg/ml. This bifunctional response of PA production in cells exposed to TGF-beta 1 may have implications with regard to the role of TGF-beta 1 in angiogenesis.